Expandable Widgetized Area

Use all default WordPress widgets or bring the area to life with custom shortcodes.
About Me

Inverto Logo
Multi Creative Freelance Portfolio
Hey, I am Inverto. Multi Creative Freelance Portfolio WordPress Theme. Built with emphasis on clean, content oriented, modern & minimalistic design.

Recent Posts
Recent Tweets
Follow us on Twitter

Being concept

Being is an extremely broad concept encompassing objective
and subjective features of reality and existence.

August 3, 2015/Art/6 min. read

Being is an extremely broad concept

encompassing objective and subjective features of reality and existence. Anything that partakes in being is also called a “being”, though often this use is limited to entities that have subjectivity (as in the expression “human being”). So broad a notion has inevitably been elusive and controversial in the history of philosophy, beginning in western philosophy with attempts among the pre-Socratics to deploy it intelligibly.

As an example of efforts in recent times, Martin Heidegger (who himself drew on ancient Greek sources) adopted German terms like Dasein to articulate the topic. Several modern approaches build on such continental European exemplars as Heidegger, and apply metaphysical results to the understanding of human psychology and the human condition generally (notably in the Existentialist tradition).

“Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage.”Lao Tzu

The transcendentals

Aristotle’s classificatory scheme had included the five predicables, or characteristics that might be predicated of a substance. One of these was the property, an essential universal true of the species, but not in the definition (in modern terms, some examples would be grammatical language, a property of man, or a spectral pattern characteristic of an element, both of which are defined in other ways). Pointing out that predicables are predicated univocally of substances; that is, they refer to “the same thing” found in each instance, St. Thomas argued that whatever can be said about being is not univocal, because all beings are unique, each actuated by a unique existence. It is the analogous possession of an existence that allows them to be identified as being; therefore, being is an analogous predication.

Whatever can be predicated of all things is universal-like but not universal, category-like but not a category. St. Thomas called them (perhaps not originally) the transcendentia, “transcendentals”, because they “climb above” the categories, just as being climbs above substance. Later academics also referred to them as “the properties of being.” The number is generally three or four.

The substance theorists

The deficit of such a bridge was first encountered in history by the Pre-Socratic philosophers during.

Act and potency

One might expect a solution to follow from such certain language but none does. Instead Aristotle launches.

Comments (5)

  • Mr. IshYoBoy / August 27, 2015 / Reply

    This theme supports comments. The comments are moderated and therefore they need to be approved before publishing. This is an example of a visitor’s first-level comment to an article or page. The comments can have various lengths and content. To see more IshYoBoy themes feel free to have a look at our ThemeForest Portfolio.

    • John Hipsterson / August 27, 2015 / Reply

      This is an example of a nested comment which is a reply of the comment above this one. Make sure to visit our website ishyoboy.com and follow our Facebook Page and Twitter Profile for interesting tricks and updates. To see the latest design sneak peeks of what we’re working on visit our Profile on Dribbble.com.

      • Alec Creativeson / August 27, 2015 / Reply

        Users can also reply on replies to a comment.. Comment replies are supported by all our themes. The depth of comment nesting is controlled by WordPress settings and it is a standard feature.

    • Dan Coderson / August 27, 2015 / Reply

      This is an example of a second nested comment which is a reply of the original comment and is on the same level of the previous reply.

  • Pete Designerson / August 27, 2015 / Reply

    This is an example of another first-level comment which does not continue the conversation of the replies above.

Add comment

Inverto Theme / Proudly powered by WordPress / Created by IshYoBoy.com